Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

The Silent Patient (Michaelides)

The Silent Patient
Alex Michaelides (2019)

(Not a review, just some notes to help me remember the things I've read. But written this way because it's the Internet, and some people will stumble across this page.)

This was selected as my Pandemic Book Club's selection for this month. I listened to it first, and then started reading the hardcover from the library.

This turned out to be an unsual experience in that in the past, I've started listening first because the audiobook is usually available before the ebook. Print books are usually available first but I tend to read print books more in the summer when I'm off. Carrying hardcovers back and forth to work (and along for all the walks I take) isn't preferable. Anyway, once I get an ebook, I generally catch up quickly to the point where I've listened to and then finish the ebook. Generally speaking, if I finish the book electronically, I'm less likely to finish listening to it.

This time, I finished the audiobook before I even opened the print edition. And I almost didn't bother reading it at all. Why? Because I was annoyed with the ending. So much so that I didn't want to actually read the book I'd listened to. However, since this is a reading blog, I will at least read until I have the online group meeting. If I'm not finished reading by then, I might not finish at all.

Okay. So why didn't I like this book? What was wrong with the ending. Also, I am aware that this is the third book in a row, where I hated the ending, but each for different reasons.

I can point to three specific problems: First, the narrator is unreliable; second, the narrator withholds information while telling a very long-winded story with a lot of details; third, the events are not documented chronologically and we are not told that it is not chronological. What I mean by this is that some scenes are actually flashbacks but we are not told that these are flashbacks. And I imagine the ending is worse in the audiobook because there really seems to be a tonal change in the narrator's voice while reading the epilogue (or the last portion).

Other points: the book is called "The Silent Patient" but should be called "The Bloody Pompous Psychoanalyst Who is Full of Himself". He's the story, not the patient. There's a side plot about his wife having an affair, which doesn't seem to have anything to do with anything, but when it actually does later on, it's more annoying than revealing. And the reasoning why the silent patient is silent is unsatisfying at best, even when he gets her to talk again.

Knowing the ending before I starting reading the print book left me open to question why he's actually doing some of the things that he's doing. It's the opposite of rereads when you see the subtlety worked into the narrative and say, "Oh, that's why he did that!". The second time, things make less sense. There are reasons I supposed, but again, unsatisfying.

The story: Alicia Berenson is a famous painter who is married to a fashion photographer (Gabriel) and who infamously kills her husband by shooting him in the face, or so we're told. From the time she is found until the present, she is mute. She either cannot or will not speak. She is committed to a mental hospital (the Grove) instead of prison. The trial was a newspaper sensation for a while.

Theo Faber is a criminal psychotherapist who is intrigued by this case and takes a position at the Grove so he can take her on as a patient. He left a good position for one that might not be there in six months, as the Grove is not doing well financially. While working the case, he acts like a detective, visiting surviving family members and others associated with her painting career. He does eventually get her to talk about the case.

Ther eisn't much more to say about the book or the other characters. I will add that someone on the discussing list for my book club mentioned that htey saw the "twist" coming long before I knew that there would be a twist instead of a simple resolution.

Again, this was an audio book and a hardcover. The ebook hadn't become available before the meeting.




If you stumbled across my page via the Internet, please check out my short book series, Burke Lore Briefs. The fourth book will be available by the time you see this!

Tuesday, September 14, 2021

The Crime Beat (Fuller)

The Crime Beat, Episode 1: New York, by A. C. Fuller (2019)

(Not a review, just some notes to help me remember the things I've read. But written this way because it's the Internet, and some people will stumble across this page.)

This popped up as a free ebook in a mailing list where most of the free ones look like some sort of paranormal or magic teen/young adult romance. Nothing wrong with that, but I've read a few of those and I have so many other things to read before I download another. Crime Beat at least sounded like it'd be different.

It was. First impressions, these were guesses based on the title and the blurb. The words "Episode 1" make it sound like it's a pilot for a TV show, and at times reads like that. In fact, I could see this as an episode of a network TV show (not basic cable or streaming). Second, the part that says "New York", as if later books will take place in other cities. Considering that one of the two parties involved -- note that the top of the page in the ebook says "A Cole-Warren Mystery" -- is a NYPD cop who's been sidelined, with pay, because of an investigation into striking a suspect. (He slammed the suspect's face into the metal grate that separates the front of the cop car from the back.) Obviously, if the action is going to move to other cities, he's not going to be reinstated any time soon, if at all.

At 192 pages, it was a short read, and it was also a quick read. This was literally 2 or 2 1/2 days for me, while I was also reading other stuff on the side. It's not that it was riveting and I couldn't put it down, but I sped through it and it kept my attention until I dropped the iPad when I was falling asleep.

The story is straight-forward for a police procedural or an investigative reporter, and this has both of those, except that the cop has to sneak around because he can't be connected to anything without possibly tainting the case. Not a lot of twists and turns. Just enough info is given about the characters to make them interesting, and that info is used later on in other ways.

The story opens with an old guy, old enough that Roger Marris autographed a baseball bat for him in 1961, while the story takes place in 2018, is a professional hit man. He kills a billionaire in front of the Met in NYC. Jane Cole, reporter for the New York Sun investigates. Cops don't like her because she's the reporter who ran the story about the brutal cop. Said cop meets Cole at the crime scene. They wind up involved in this together to find the guy that did it. Again, straightforward after that, but it's par of a bigger story.

This next paragraph is a SPOILER: so I knew in advance, just from the setup that the cop was going to get bounced over the allegation, even if a retraction was printed in the paper. He was going to be sacrificed to placate the mob calling for justice. This much made sense, but then there was the twist: the brass would likely say, "See, look, there are brutal black cops as well as white cops." NOPE! I don't buy that. First off, I wouldn't think that the brass would ever concede to brutal cops, even if there are a few bad apples, but the race thing screws it all up. The "mobs" in NYC would probably be more outraged that a black officer is thrown off the force while white officers remain. Moreover, and maybe I'm being cynical, but I believe that the groundswell against the cops would be lessened by the fact that it was a black cop using force against (I'm inferring, if this wasn't outright stated) a white criminal.

Checking online I see that it will be nine stories (novellas) altogether, each telling a piece of the story. The nine part was failry obvious from the mention of 9 weapons a number of times in the story. Honestly, I was surprised one of the two didn't jump to that conclusion earlier, even if they were primarily concerned with this murder.

Will I read more? I wouldn't say no. Will I buy any? Probably not. I'll check the library at some point. I have a lot of stuff to read. (A quick check of two libraries shows no results. Oh, well.)

On Earth as It Is on Television (Jane)

On Earth as It Is on Television Emily Jane (2023) [AUDIO ONLY -- no image] (Not a review, just some notes to help me reme...